<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fighting fire with fire &#8211; using phage viruses to defeat bacterial infections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://futurismic.com/2007/09/03/fighting-fire-with-fire-using-phage-viruses-to-defeat-bacterial-infections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futurismic.com/2007/09/03/fighting-fire-with-fire-using-phage-viruses-to-defeat-bacterial-infections/</link>
	<description>Presenting the fact and fiction of tomorrow since 2001</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:03:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Raven</title>
		<link>http://futurismic.com/2007/09/03/fighting-fire-with-fire-using-phage-viruses-to-defeat-bacterial-infections/comment-page-1/#comment-2592</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Raven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 10:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futurismic.com/2007/09/03/fighting-fire-with-fire-using-phage-viruses-to-defeat-bacterial-infections/#comment-2592</guid>
		<description>Cheers for the corrections, Michael - ScienceDaily isn&#039;t always astonishingly accurate, and I&#039;ll confess to getting a little confused as to the difference between bacteria and viruses.

And I doubt the US will be the only place to restrict this sort of medicine if there&#039;s a financial incentive to do so ... though we can hope otherwise. I hear Estonia&#039;s lovely this time of year! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers for the corrections, Michael &#8211; ScienceDaily isn&#8217;t always astonishingly accurate, and I&#8217;ll confess to getting a little confused as to the difference between bacteria and viruses.</p>
<p>And I doubt the US will be the only place to restrict this sort of medicine if there&#8217;s a financial incentive to do so &#8230; though we can hope otherwise. I hear Estonia&#8217;s lovely this time of year! <img src='http://futurismic.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Roberts</title>
		<link>http://futurismic.com/2007/09/03/fighting-fire-with-fire-using-phage-viruses-to-defeat-bacterial-infections/comment-page-1/#comment-2570</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 04:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futurismic.com/2007/09/03/fighting-fire-with-fire-using-phage-viruses-to-defeat-bacterial-infections/#comment-2570</guid>
		<description>E. coli is a bacterium, not a virus.  In this case, E.coli&#039;s rat-infecting relative Citrobacter rodentium was used as a testbed for phage treatment.

Phages are viruses that infect bacteria (they&#039;re bacteriophages).  Each phage infects a single species of bacteria, so if you know for sure what bacterium you&#039;ve got an infection of, and if you have one or more phages available for it, you can treat the host with the phages, and BIP!  No more bacteria -- and absolutely no side effects for the host, because the phages can&#039;t infect anything but bacteria.

I can easily envision this being a treatment in the future when virus synthesis will be a pushbutton affair.  Analyze the bacteria causing the problem, download the phage definition file, synthesize up a batch, and viola!  Treatment complete!

Until then, though -- in the US, at least, each phage will need individual and specific FDA approval, as I understand it, and will only affect a single species of bacterium.  No money in it, you see.  So nobody will attempt clinical trials.

Bah.  Another reason to leave the States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E. coli is a bacterium, not a virus.  In this case, E.coli&#8217;s rat-infecting relative Citrobacter rodentium was used as a testbed for phage treatment.</p>
<p>Phages are viruses that infect bacteria (they&#8217;re bacteriophages).  Each phage infects a single species of bacteria, so if you know for sure what bacterium you&#8217;ve got an infection of, and if you have one or more phages available for it, you can treat the host with the phages, and BIP!  No more bacteria &#8212; and absolutely no side effects for the host, because the phages can&#8217;t infect anything but bacteria.</p>
<p>I can easily envision this being a treatment in the future when virus synthesis will be a pushbutton affair.  Analyze the bacteria causing the problem, download the phage definition file, synthesize up a batch, and viola!  Treatment complete!</p>
<p>Until then, though &#8212; in the US, at least, each phage will need individual and specific FDA approval, as I understand it, and will only affect a single species of bacterium.  No money in it, you see.  So nobody will attempt clinical trials.</p>
<p>Bah.  Another reason to leave the States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
