Your “definitions” are the ones redefining words; you don’t have an accurate understanding of any of the phrases listed. Pro-choice, affirmative action, liberal… you throw those words out like they are “obviously insidious Orwellian words used to brainwash the masses” without applying any of that “reason” you seem to desperately invoking.

Try getting a better understanding of what liberals and/or Democrats really are after instead of parroting some dittohead nonsense…

Then why do they enthusiastically endorse massive government Ponzi Schemes? Where is the “reason”?

Why do they redefine words? “Pro-choice” equals no choice. “Affirmative” action equals racism. “Liberal” equals illiberal. “Progressive” equals regressive.

Where’s the reason?

I have a provisional hypothesis for both depending on we are defending “left wing.” If by that we tend to mean European nations, I suspect the answer to both is that the U.S. Constitution is a much better protector of individual rights and that the emphasis on individual rights in this country provides both cultural and legal obstacles to stabilizing marriages and curbing crime.

On the crime issues, when you look at European states they tend to have far more expansive police powers. In many parts of Europe if there is an unsolved rape it is completely legal for police to simply round up all men in the area and perform DNA tests on them.

Obviously this is an oversimplification, but I expect to some extent the high crime rate and lack of stable marriages is simply the price we pay for a much more expansive view of individual freedom.