<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charlie Stross&#8217; 21st Century crystal ball</title>
	<atom:link href="http://futurismic.com/2009/03/02/charlie-stross-21st-century-crystal-ball/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://futurismic.com/2009/03/02/charlie-stross-21st-century-crystal-ball/</link>
	<description>Presenting the fact and fiction of tomorrow since 2001</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:03:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom James</title>
		<link>http://futurismic.com/2009/03/02/charlie-stross-21st-century-crystal-ball/comment-page-1/#comment-20267</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futurismic.com/?p=6342#comment-20267</guid>
		<description>Stross definitely has more than one idea. So I&#039;d he wasn&#039;t a hedgehog.

And as I say &lt;a href=&quot;http://futurismic.com/2009/03/02/why-pundits-always-get-it-wrong/#comment-20264&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; Stross is a &lt;i&gt;writer&lt;/a&gt;; a bard or a storyteller. 

Stross makes stuff up to explore subtle issues of human nature and technological ideas. He tells lies to tell us truths about being human.

What he &lt;i&gt;does not&lt;/i&gt; do is claim to be an &quot;expert&quot; on anything. He doesn&#039;t make false claims of superior deductive reasoning or inside knowledge (I&#039;d take the FAQ of the 21st Century bit as a jobbing SF writer thinking out loud and expressing his opinions in a straightforward manner).

The danger arises when you start taking pundits TV/newspaper-hedgehog-pundits too seriously and imagining they&#039;re anything more than entertaining court jesters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stross definitely has more than one idea. So I&#8217;d he wasn&#8217;t a hedgehog.</p>
<p>And as I say <a href="http://futurismic.com/2009/03/02/why-pundits-always-get-it-wrong/#comment-20264" rel="nofollow">here</a> Stross is a <i>writer; a bard or a storyteller. </p>
<p>Stross makes stuff up to explore subtle issues of human nature and technological ideas. He tells lies to tell us truths about being human.</p>
<p>What he </i><i>does not</i> do is claim to be an &#8220;expert&#8221; on anything. He doesn&#8217;t make false claims of superior deductive reasoning or inside knowledge (I&#8217;d take the FAQ of the 21st Century bit as a jobbing SF writer thinking out loud and expressing his opinions in a straightforward manner).</p>
<p>The danger arises when you start taking pundits TV/newspaper-hedgehog-pundits too seriously and imagining they&#8217;re anything more than entertaining court jesters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
