The thing with the Turing Test is that it’s such a loose experiment; it becomes (arguably) much easier to pass if the intelligence being tested is tuned for the context in which the test is being performed, and to the human respondent.
Here’s a QED via web-culture cynic and curmudgeon Nick Carr, who points out that Ben Weber has taken a leaf from ELIZA’s playbook and created a chatbot for the Starcraft online games:
Once every thirty seconds, EISBot randomly selects a message from a pool of 75 messages and sends it to the console. The results can be quite convincing:
- EISBot: Whats up with Savior recently?
- EISBot: Tasteless is my homeboy
- EISBot: It says I need more pylons, what a pylon?
- EISBot: What to ally victory?
- Player: damn you
- Player: im not stupid
- EISBot: Wanna join my clan
- Player: dunno
- Player: im not that great
- Player: lol
- EISBot: So, this game is pretty much over
- Player: yeah
- Player: lol
- Player: im playing off race
- Player: lol
- EISBot: Quit wasting time, come kill me
- EISBot: What kind of hardware are you using? I’m on a 486 with 16M ram, pure luxory!!!
- Player: i dunno
Says Carr, from beneath a grubby flatcap, with a wet-eyed grayhound curled up at his feet:
Note that the bot’s one major flaw is that its command of the English language, particularly the use of punctuation marks, is much too sophisticated in comparison with that of the human. The sure way to distinguish the computer’s messages from the human’s is to recognize that the computer has a rather sentimental attachment to the apostrophe and the comma.
I take this as another indication that I am correct in my suspicion that when computers finally pass the Turing test it won’t be because computers have become smarter; it will be because humans have become dumber.
Oh, how right you are, Mister Carr. Why, until maybe forty years ago when those pesky computers came on the scene, young people were almost universally literate, and spoke in long erudite sentences when talking with their peers on matters of mutual interest! How the mighty have fallen…
… although, with that said, three cats and a catnip-dusted keyboard would probably be enough to pass the Turing Test if it were conducted in a YouTube comment thread. YMMV.
One thought on “Contextual Turing Tests”
I threw a eliza bot, literally, as in explicitly started with the original so all the psychobabble is still in there.
Into my little virtual world, just added some more keywords to respond to the things the kids often say.
and yes, it really is still enough to fool people.
I’ve seen kids talk to it for a while then call it a bot then back down when it responds to the accusation… Also I think it’s dating a bunch of people 🙂
Try it here if you want to.
Yes it is called lieza, the point of its existence is a joke after all.
Comments are closed.