Don’t want Alzheimer’s? Study says you might need to be a better person

Will being strong and dependable mean a stronger mind at old age?A lengthy study of nuns, priests and monks by a medical researcher in Chicago produced a stunning correlation between the conscientiousness of the person and the likelihood of dementia in later life. Conscientiousness was described as someone self-disciplined, scrupulous and dependable. Those that scored in the 90th percentile for conscientiousness in 1994 had 89% less chance of contracting Alzheimer’s than someone in the 10th percentile as well as less cognitive decline. The researcher’s hypothesis for the link is that determined and dependable people are more resilient and adaptable to change.

[via reuters, photo by triblondon]

MummyWraps – tinfoil hats for the unborn

Purpoted sources of 'electrical smog' No matter how far we advance technologically, there’s one product that has always sold to the easily alarmed …. and snake-oil still shifts units to this day. Point in case: MummyWraps, a garment designed for pregnant women made from a special fabric that purportedly shields the developing baby from those possibly-lethal-and-cancer-causing-depending-on-who-you-ask cell-phone signals. It’s not clear whether or not the company intends to make a matching bonnet for the expectant mother … perhaps it’s too late for her, and the Illuminati have already rewired her thoughts with microwaves. But then surely they’d tell her not to buy shielding for her unborn kids? Sounds like a job for Occam’s Razor[Via Engadget] [Image from MummyWraps website]

[tags]electro-smog, paranoia, snake-oil, technology[/tags]

"The brightest illumination source ever created by man"

Diagram of Orion Helium Ion Microscope That’s the claim for the Orion Helium Ion Microscope from ALIS (Atomic Level Imaging Source), a Peabody, Massachusetts-based unit of Carl Zeiss SMT AG. It’s a next-generation microsocope that will enable us to see things we’ve never been able to see before, even with the most sophisticated scanning electron microsocope. The company has already sold one unit and has five more under construction. (Via MedGadget.)

I haven’t been this excited since I got my first microscope the Christmas I turned seven…although I don’t suppose I can expect one of these under the tree. Pity. (Illustration from ALIS.)

[tags]microscopy, technology, optics[/tags]

Radiohead change the face of music

Radiohead’s new album is a revolution in distribution

I’ve been saying for a few years now that as soon as a major band started selling their own records on their own website, the music companies were doomed. Today it looks like the revolution has started. Radiohead, the superstar band that finished their contract with EMI following their last album ‘Hail To The Thief’ have announced that their new album ‘In Rainbows’ will be released on October 10th, purely through their website. In a move that’s going to send ripples through the music industry, the album download has no set price. The website literally says ‘Pay what you want’. With Nine Inch Nails pledging to sell all their records direct to fans after their contract ends, it’s looking like the future of music is going to be very different.

Radiohead’s move is a very smart one – bands make the majority of their money by touring under the current economic model. Even if large numbers of people download the album for free, aside from the small cost of recording and the bandwidth for their website, the album has virtually no overheads as a digital download. That means that any money donated by downloaders goes straight into the band’s pockets without going through ten different middle-managers first, exactly as I said in my post about amazon’s DRM free model last week. Even if the average payment for a download is £3, Radiohead will perversely still get a fair bit more money than the 5% -odd royalty cut of a £10 CD sold in HMV or Virgin. It’s reassuring that the move has been made by a band that in my opinion is one of the best in the world.

[via boing boing and music 2.0, picture from Radiohead’s new album site]

China’s One Child Policy has some flaws (surprise, surprise)

If you’re concerned about the environment and reducing your carbon footprint, forget about local food and driving a Prius.  One of the biggest reductions you can make is to not have that second kid you were thinking of.  It’s worked in China, hasn’t it?

Well, not really.  Chinese culture works similar to the West in that the male child retains the family name.  But in addition, that male child will be around to take care of the aging parents.  Girls, on the other hand, basically become part of their husband’s family and have little to no contact with their birth family.  While that may be changing in the cities and more modern areas, the old ways prevail in rural China.  And there’s a lot of China that still behaves that way.

So what to do?  Well, first off a family hoping for a boy that first time around will abort any females.  Demographically, this is a nightmare as it leads to a surplus of males, some of whom will resort to violence to spread their genes, while others might resort to something a bit kinky, like wife-sharing.

If you can’t get your boy the natural way, China’s got a market for that, too. Roughly 190 children a day go missing in China.  For comparison, England and Wales combined report less than half that number in an entire year.  A boy can fetch several hundred pounds, about six months’ salary for a factory worker.

Something must be done about the population, but trying to make a law about something like this without taking culture into account can lead to big problems.  A better way might be providing contraception to those who need it.

(image via September Mourning)

Presenting the fact and fiction of tomorrow since 2001